#GOOD CINEBENCH SCORE DRIVERS#
#GOOD CINEBENCH SCORE MANUAL#
#GOOD CINEBENCH SCORE SOFTWARE#

Even tasks like doing large compile jobs in linux are predictable where we have a sub 1% test variance over 100 runs. We have run significantly longer workloads on this machine, the types that take days to run and they are extremely consistent. We are still going to be introducing our 8K version soon simply to get longer run times on large machines.ĥ-7 seconds is an extremely short time to run a “benchmark” on a modern CPU. not one of 100 runs but every run moving significantly), we know it is time to take a look at a benchmark.Īs an example, even though our c-ray “hard” setting we developed in 2012 is starting to run into the same 5-7 window, it is still producing repeatable runs with well under 5% benchmark variance. Generally when we see that level of variance, and consistent variance (e.g. Along those lines, we are seeing fairly massive differences, at times greater than 20% peak to valley on some runs. That is important as modern CPUs will typically hit an all core turbo mode. One area you will note is that the entirety of runs is in the 5-7 second range. We took a 100-second clip from those 6 minutes around the world record run just to show this variance at play: Here is a video of the results we received with simply about 6 minutes of recording time spent launching runs. We understand why Maxon has made this choice. That will make the benchmark more valuable for higher-end systems but will be more time consuming for desktop parts. Now it seems like there is a clear need, at the high-end, for a larger benchmark test scene. Covering that large of a scale with benchmarks that will work through multiple generations is quite a feat. We deal with this on a regular basis as we were the first site to benchmark the Intel Atom C3338 dual core “Denverton” server CPUs but also test large systems like last generation’s quad E7 PowerEdge R930 and this generation’s quad Intel Xeon Platinum 81. At STH, we are a data center focused site so all of our test systems are tucked away in a secure facility well out of earshot so doing longer test runs is not an issue. On the other hand, you have small dual core Pentium chips and previous generation (slow) Atom chips that the benchmark must run on. One of the difficulties scaling benchmarks is that on one hand you now have 4 socket systems like this with 28 core CPUs. Is Cinebench R15 Breaking as a Benchmark? Specifically, the system may be able to go higher as we are seeing a telltale sign that the hardware has out scaled the software. As a world record, that may be exciting for some, but there is more to the story.

#GOOD CINEBENCH SCORE SOFTWARE#

Given these are expensive CPUs targeted at software that can cost thousands (or more) per core. Still, that is a score that represents over a 20% improvement versus what we had before. Intel 4P Skylake SP Cinebench R15 World Record Run Result 11584

A New Cinebench R15 World Record 11584 cb CPU Scoreįirst off, the result: here is a screenshot from the video of the system reaching 11584cb.

#GOOD CINEBENCH SCORE DRIVERS#

Not only did the new drivers help improve performance, but we saw something very strange. While testing another Xeon system in the lab, we noticed there were some new chipset/ BMC drivers available so we loaded them onto the quad Intel Xeon Platinum 8180 system. As a result, we had old drivers on our installation. We did that video prior to the official Intel Xeon Scalable Processor launch. Last week we published a video that we did before the Skylake-SP launch called Crushing Cinebench R15 V4.

Today, we are seeing evidence of Cinebench R15 simply breaking. Much of its popularity is due to the fact that it can be run on even the lowliest of Atom machines and ran (until today) fairly well into dual and quad socket systems.

#GOOD CINEBENCH SCORE MANUAL#

V1.1C manual low.Intel 4P Skylake SP Cinebench R15 World Record Run Result 11584Ĭinebench has been a popular rendering benchmark for some time.

Good cinebench score